Sunday, February 18, 2007
Re: Xdelta 3.0p (download)
Xdelta-3.x processes a window of input at a time, using a fixed memory budget. This release raises some of the default maximums, for better large-file compression. The default memory settings for large files add up to about 100Mb. (*)
A user wrote to confirm good performance on 3.7Gb WIM files, great!
A user writes about code size:
I'm looking for your ideas on recursive directory diff. One solution uses tar:
Thanks for the feedback (file a new issue).
(*) Xdelta-1.x processes the whole input at once, and its data structure takes linear space, (source file size/2)+O(1). Xdelta-1.x reads the the entire source file fully two times (to generate checksums, to match the input), using at least half as much memory as the source file size.
Xdelta-3.x processes a window of input at a time, using a fixed memory budget. This release raises some of the default maximums, for better large-file compression. The default memory settings for large files add up to about 100Mb. (*)
A user wrote to confirm good performance on 3.7Gb WIM files, great!
- So, to answer the question in your post on Jan 28th, yes we are using xdelta3 with files larger than 1Gb and it's working well.
I'm off to try boosting the compression and see how much we can scrunch the patch down. Thank-you for an extremely useful tool that is going to hugely improve our ability to distribute updates to our build images.
A user writes about code size:
- I saw your post where you said you’d improved the compression in Xdelta3 and that it was now slightly faster than 1.1. Do you happen to know where the two stand without compression enabled? (We don’t use Xdelta’s compression because we compress all of our files after the fact with Rar solid compression.) Thanks too for the link to those benchmarks. Those were quite helpful, and it’s cool to see Xdelta come out on top. ;)
I will say this: One nice thing about the new Xdelta is its smaller size! Xdelta 1.1’s exe is 1Mb when not compressed via UPX, whereas Xdelta3 is 100Kb. Nice. :)
I'm looking for your ideas on recursive directory diff. One solution uses tar:
- XDELTA="-s source" tar --use-compress-program=xdelta3 -cf ...
Thanks for the feedback (file a new issue).
(*) Xdelta-1.x processes the whole input at once, and its data structure takes linear space, (source file size/2)+O(1). Xdelta-1.x reads the the entire source file fully two times (to generate checksums, to match the input), using at least half as much memory as the source file size.
Comments:
Post a Comment